|
Page 1 of 5 {UNFINISHED}
Replacing America’s Romanticized Image of the American Indian and the Mound-Builders with the Facts
A research paper by James Hutchison
During
the 19th century, as settlers began to establish farms and towns in the
Mississippi Valley areas, they discovered groups of low dome-shaped
mounds found to contain burials laden with exotic, marketable
artifacts. However, when the geometric earthworks of the Ohio valley
were discovered, it was obvious that an advanced civilization had once
thrived in the area. Evidently the “New Americans” were unaware or
unmindful of the records left by the first European explorers that
explained the mysterious mound cultures. What became a “mystery race”
to the new Americans had built the mounds and the fortifications then,
for unknown reasons to these settlers, had just as mysteriously
disappeared, probably (they believed) at the hand of the Amerindian.
Farmers plowed the mounds or leveled them with scrapers for their rich
soil while others dug into them in search of artifacts. The items they
found were of exquisite workmanship, greatly appealing to their
aesthetic appetites, and thus of monetary value as an exotic art form.
The pieces were recovered with little or no regard to their
archaeological importance and sold, along with tales of some long-lost
white race, as the remains of some great Atlantian civilization (Thomas
20 - 24). However, this was not the first era of such ideas. The idea
of a mystery race in the Americas had began in the 16th century when
England cited the Madoc legend of the 12th century in an effort to lay
legal claim to the Americas and was only resurfacing. This pattern
would repeat itself many times and become known by some scholars as
American Amnesia. The material that was and is produced by those that
wrote about and studied the mounds would become an important factor in
the evolution of the American Saga.
It is difficult to excuse the
blatant disregard of historical records that gave eye-witness accounts
of the Mound Cultures such as Garcilaso de la Vega's History de la
Florida, to favor romantic ideas and speculation of some mysterious
lost race, but it is that very act played an important role not only in
the founding of American archaeology, but in proving who had built the
mounds.
There were many people studying Amerindians in the 18th
and 19th centuries, but the confines of this paper limit the inclusion
of all. Thus, only the more definitive and/or influential scientists
and historians of the times will be mentioned. The historical account
of American Anthropology should start with the De Soto expedition that
landed on May 31, 1538 with some 950 men in what today is Florida.(
Georgia) Their purpose was one of conquest and treasure-seeking ( Vega
59 ). The exploits and events of this expedition were compiled and
recorded by Garcilaso de la Vega, who collected journals from some of
the survivors and an account left by an author who is known to
posterity simply as a Knight of Elvas ( Vega xx-xxiii ). These accounts
describe in detail the still-thriving communities of Amerindian Mound
Cultures as well as their system of government and the extent of their
empires. Unfortunately, these records went virtually unnoticed or
ignored by the scientific community until Cyrus Thomas cited them in
his report to the Bureau of Ethnology in 1894 (Thomas 18, & 603-610
).
In 1986 Silverberg published The Mound Builders wherein he
gives a brief survey on the history of American archaeology. Roger
Kennedy, in 1994, looked again at the history of American archaeology,
but in a much more detailed scope than attempted by Silverberg. Kennedy
also included new research on Thomas Jefferson, dealt with the madoc
legend, Mormanism and many other facets lightly touched on or bypassed
all together by Silverberg. He demonstrated and explained a phenomonon
that he dubbed American amnesia, where the Mound Builders were
concerned, in good detail and explained American romanticism in the
context of popular and academic views towards American Indians. I will
relegate a brief review of Kennedy’s work to appendex A and endeavor to
carry the torch, if only for a little distance, from where Kennedy left
it.
|